Yes, a falling tree makes a sound (and it has a lot to say)

Is the idea of a narrative exhibition something
you’ve been thinking about?

I’ve thought
about narrative a lot at Kling & Bang, and about how we could alter the space
in small ways. The whole context of this exhibition is creating an alternative universe,
inspired by my research on space creation in feminist science fiction. When you’re
reading science fiction, you can be transported into another planet where creatures
look very different from yourself and as with all reading, you feel yourself being
immersed in another world. I’m thinking about how this can be transferred into a
gallery space.

At the forefront
is the idea of space travel within narrative and how that can be modified into a
bodily experience, heightening the senses experienced when you walk into the gallery.
Kling & Bang is such a familiar space to many people in Iceland, and I wanted
to think of ways to make it feel a little bit more unfamiliar, like a guest from
a different planet. We are creating hidden doors, for example, and walls that push
open.

A lot of the works in the exhibitions are using
different softwares and technologies, a video game for example. How do you see the
potential of technology within science fiction?

Science fiction
is how we imagine our future and technology helps build possible future narratives.
In many of the works where technology plays a large part, it’s a really personal,
spiritual approach to technology—warm tech, rather than hard or cold. Artists play
with the relationship between the body and technologies or myths. In Josephine van
Schendel’s work, the AI chatbot is actually Hellenistic goddesses retelling their
narratives to a technology, for example. Those stories are then fed into the bot,
attempting to change the narrative so that it’s not based on the typical, male-dominated
storylines that we have heard in traditional mythology. Instead, we’re trying to
use it to create a voice or to reawaken buried voices.

So, technology
is a really big part of the exhibition, but it’s always in a dialogue with social
behaviours. I don’t like to think that it’s going to take over. Technology must
go together with human connection, creating a kind of speculative fiction or fabulation.
Science fiction is not escapism, it’s more of an escape into reality and as such,
it’s a perfect platform because it creates a space that anyone can enter on an equal
basis. It’s a lot harder to talk about your lived experiences if you are a person
in a marginalised group and you’re trying to explain a situation to someone who
is really privileged. But in science fiction, you can create a planet where power
structures are altered, so the marginalised person can be the ruler of this planet,
or they can be complete equals.

Do you see this exhibition as a political project?

It is quite
political, but in a really playful way. Tabita Rezaire’s work is a text message
conversation where the Western world is trying to apologise for colonising and for
enslaving people. For many visitors, the work is confrontational. It’s produced
with neon colours in a way that is true to her style, so it’s political while being  humorous and accessible.

The exhibition is also
concerned with representation and that makes it political by default—eight of the
nine artists are women, for example. The hierarchy is a bit different in this show
than what you are used to in a cis, patriarchal and white dominated art world. It’s
important to me that the works are not separate or hierarchical, so I try not to
create borders between them, and a lot of the time they are bleeding into each other—they’re
all having conversations with each other in the space.

Let’s talk about the process of selecting the artists.
Do they work together and are you forming new connections with artists that you
haven’t worked with before?

Both Tabita
Rezaire and Tarek Lakhrissi were artists I researched during my studies, so I’d
had conversations before with them and we’ve had text message dialogues. I put the
artists together because I saw that they had a lot of things in common, so it was
a form of matchmaking. Then they met via email and it’s been quite an organic process.
Relationships, pen pals and conversation groups have emerged from the process.

Also, I’ve been
working really close with the artists, since most of them are creating new work.
During the past year, they’ve been making the works for the exhibition, so I’ve
been having monthly, if not more, meetings with each artist, to go through the process
of making together. The step by step of following their work has been really interesting
because I get to be a part of the works’ inception and construction.

In the exhibition, there are designers and artists—how
important is it for you to distinguish art from other disciplines?

The borders
between art and design can be as blurry as you wish, I think it all depends on the
context and varying approaches. It’s a wide spectrum, and in my experience, the
more you try to define art, design or the difference between them—there is never
a clear answer—these fields can be wildly different or similar.

Elín Margot
is a designer and artist, for example. Her work belongs in both realms, but our
approach to this work she’s making for the exhibition is from an artist’s point
of view. The nicest surprise is Þórey Björk Halldórsdóttir, an experienced designer
and brewer, because I invited her to do the drinks for the opening, but then we
had lots of conversations which lead to her creating an artwork—which I find really
interesting.

Also, part of
the brief I first gave the artists was an encouragement to create work that they
have had in their minds but haven’t found the platform for. That has pushed people
who are designers more by trade to allow those creative ideas to come forth, because
you don’t really have to think about the use value or the consequences, it’s more
like—if it doesn’t work, that’s fine—this is your world, create whatever you think
fits in there. If the beer tastes like piss, that’s just how beer tastes on this
planet! I think that really helped create interesting work, because a lot of risk
taking occurred. (And by the way, the beer tastes heavenly!)

What do you feel is lacking in the Icelandic art
world?

The most obvious
answer is that there is a lot of diversity in the Icelandic art scene, and I just
don’t feel it’s being represented enough. It should be a lot more diverse, because
Iceland has changed a lot. In 2009, around only 8% of the country was made up of
people who were not born in Iceland, and then ten years later, it’s about 15% so
it’s growing so fast. That’s not being reflected in the museums and galleries in
Iceland. There definitely are some really interesting artist run spaces, but going
forward only good things can come from having more platforms for a growing diversity
of voices.

Perhaps we also
need to be challenged more—it’s hard to have difficult conversations in Iceland
because they involve such a drastic change from our usual comfort zone. For example,
where I live in London, nothing is really comfortable, so you’re constantly asking
questions. I’ve spent a lot of time asking myself how I can have a positive influence
in the Icelandic art scene. I think this exhibition is one way I’m doing that, because
it’s showcasing a diverse group of young Icelandic and international artists, together
in one space. All of the artists work on the borders of reality and fiction, and
a lot of the works are about how they identify in this world. It includes, for example,
Brokat films, and Joanna Pawlowska, who is part of that group, is Polish and lives
and works in Iceland. I thought, since Polish people are the biggest minority group
in Iceland, it’s important to have their voices in this show.

Brokat films use Youtube to platform strange performance
works that are somewhere between influencer parody and psychedelic animations—how
did you discover them?

I discovered
them through Midtpunkt because Joanna Pawlowska (who is part of duo) is a part of
the team that runs the exhibition space. I saw their Youtube channel, and I was
just like, ‘what is going on here?’ It doesn’t explain very much, but their vlog-style
videos take you on board surreal journeys, so I sent them an Instagram message and
we began a conversation.

Where does your interest in science fiction come
from?

I know it comes
from a feeling of not belonging. Then for me, there’s the process of seeking comfort
in science fiction and finding it to be a space where I can create a place for belonging,
and I can read stories about the author who felt they belong there too.

The recent popularity
of science fiction is also something that happens naturally, going through the pandemic,
we ask: ‘what’s the future going to look like?’ There are apocalyptic feelings surfacing,
or hopes for a rebirth of the earth. In terms of global warming too, we’re living
in an era where the future is precarious. I feel that I really want to bring that
conversation to Reykjavik.

Do you conceive of a specific experience that you
want visitors to the show to have?

I would like
to think that the visitor can leave with a broader idea about what the future could
look like, and that they allow fantasy to come into play when they think about that
future. I hope they get a deeper understanding of the lived realities of someone
else other than themselves—I want to expand their perspectives and allow other realms
to infiltrate their own.

–

‘Yes, a falling tree makes a sound (and it has a lot
to say)’ is open at Kling & Bang from 31 March 2021. Artists included in the
exhibition are Josephine van Schendel, Bára Bjarnadóttir, Tarek Lakhrissi, Brokat Films, Dýrfinna Benita Basalan, Elín Margot, Þórey Björk
Halldórsdóttir and Tabita Rezarie. A publication designed by Signatura
Books, features Ursula Le Guin, and a selection of artists and writers, released
in early May.